Andrew Cullison

Publications
Articles

• “Descriptivism, Scope, and Apparently Empty Names” (forthcoming) Philosophical Studies with Ben Caplan.
• “When Does Falsehood Preclude Knowledge” (forthcoming) Pacific Philosophical Quarterly with Neil Feit.
• “Frege’s Puzzle,” (forthcoming) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
• “Critical Review of Learning from Words,” (forthcoming) Philosophical Books.
• “Some Puzzles About Methodology in Epistemology” (forthcoming) Continuum Companion to Epistemology.
• A Defense of the No Minimum Response to the Problem of Evil” (2011) Religious Studies 47:1, 121-123
• “What Are Seemings?,” (2010) Ratio 23:3, 260-274
• “Two Solutions to the Problem of Divine Hiddenness,” (2010) American Philosophical Quarterly 47:2, 119-134
  
• “Moral Perception,” (2010) European Journal of Philosophy 18:2, 159-175
• “On the Nature of Testimony,” (2010) Episteme: Journal of Social Epistemology 7:2, 114-127
• “Three Millian Ways to Resolve Open Questions,” (2009) Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 3:1 pp. 1-17
• “Privileged Access, Externalism, and Ways of Believing,” (2007) Philosophical Studies 136:3 pp. 305-318
• “Omniscience as a Dispositional State,” (2006) Philosophia Christi 8:1 pp. 151-160

Books

• The Continuum Companion to Epistemology, editor, (under contract) Continuum Press

Presentations
Refereed Presentations

• “A Defense of Phenomenal Conservatism,” Pacific APA, March 2006
• “Privileged Access, Externalism, and Ways of Believing,” Pacific APA, March 2005
• “Anti-Realism Meets Amoral Twin Earth,” Pacific APA, March 2004
• “Basic Moral Beliefs,” Syracuse University Graduate Student Conference in Philosophy, April 2005
• “Phenomenal Conservatism and The Rationality of Theism,” Society of Christian Philosophers Eastern Regional Meeting, December 2004
• “Omniscience as a Dispositional State,” Western NY/PA Regional Meeting of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, April 2003
• “A Generality Problem for Evidentialism,” Mid-South Philosophy Conference, February 2003
• “Kenotic Christology and Disjunctive Properties,” Society of Christian Philosophers Eastern Regional Meeting, November 2002

Invited Presentations

• “Epistemic Circularity,” West Virginia University Undergraduate Philosophy Conference Keynote, April 2008
• “A Defense of Phenomenal Conservatism,” SUNY-Buffalo, May 2008
• “Comments on ‘Fragile Events and the Causal Relation,’” Pacific APA 2008
• “Comments on ‘Moral Realism and Ways of Life,’” Central APA 2008
• “The Problem of Divine Hiddenness,” DePauw University, October 2007
• “Three Millian Ways to Resolve an Open Question,” University of Manitoba, November 2006
• “Three Millian Ways to Resolve an Open Question,” Western Washington University, January 2007
• “Three Millian Ways to Resolve an Open Question,”SUNY-Fredonia, February 2007
• “Three Millian Ways to Resolve an Open Question,”West Virginia University, February 2007
• “A (Reluctant) Defense of the Singer Solution to World Poverty,” University of Manitoba, Ethics Centre, November 2006
• “Philosophy of Education,” Faculty Development Program: Teaching Scholars Program, West Virginia University, September 2006
• “Comments on ‘Favoring, Polarity, and Particularism,’” Central APA, March 2006
• “Ethics in Research,” Faculty Development Program: Teaching Scholars Summer Institute, West Virginia University, June 2006
• “Inference to the Best Explanation,” University of Rochester, College Writing Program, May 2005
• “The Ethics of Abortion,” University of Rochester, PHL Council, November 2004
• “Using Formal Arguments to Motivate Class Discussion,” University of Rochester, College Writing Program, October 2004
• “Harmless Wrongdoing and Abortion,” SUNY-Geneseo, February 2004
• “Plato and the Republic,” Guest Lecturer, SUNY-Geneseo, February 2003
• “Comments on Daniel Cheung’s ‘Proper Functionalism, Reliabilism and Idiosyncratic Cognition,’” University of Rochester Graduate Epistemology Conference, November 2002

One Response to “Research”

1. trinities - More on the Loyola’s “white is black” passage (Dale), on March 1st, 2010 at 11:37 am Said:

   [...] been clearly separated by philosophers – see the paper “What are Seemings?” here by my colleague Andy Cullison. Here’s one way to see the distinction. Suppose there was an [...]

Leave a Reply

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail