Mike Kovac – Man With A Camera
…excitement is my business. I find it by poking prying and listening. When I find what I want, I record it with my camera. Its fun, money and people. I dont know which I like best.”
A few weeks ago my buddy Ryan and I where out shooting and he mentioned an old show that aired in the late 50′s called “Man with a camera” it wasn’t until tonight after seeing a promotional shot of Charles Bronson from the showon celebrity camera club, that I decided to look up some clips on youtube.
Lo and behold, both seasons seem to be there in their entirety – full length episodes!!!
Bronson plays former combat cameraman turned freelance photog “Mike Kovac” from what I can eek from the couple of episodes I watched this evening, his dangerous assignments get him and his camera in to some tight situations. But Kovac always gets his shot in the end. Its actually a pretty decent show, its got a bit of a dark pulp feel, similar to the twilight zone, but not as campy.
Even technically its not as cheesy as it could be – Bronson is always metering, fiddling with his camera, reloading film and such. In one scene, he’s developing prints in the darkroom and remarks to a police officer “you can turn that light on now.” once the print is in the fixer. Apparently the creators tried to stay true to the period in the photo technology that they used. Kovac’s station wagon actually had a phone in it… and a mobile darkroom.
I believe the camera he is using – in the first few episodes at least – is the exact model Graflex super speed graphic that I own, wich tickles me to no end.
Anyway if you are into vintage cameras and television shows, this one is a gem that I hadn’t heard of until recently. I hope you enjoy it as much as I am.
Big Rewards and Small Surprises
If I had to describe my first weekend with the Fujifilm X100 with one word I would have to use “liberating”. The recent three day odyssey I spent in Ottawa with just the x100 and x100 alone was one of those “a-ha” moments in life.
Backstory
Over the past year I’ve been looking to fill a void in my photography setup. I wanted something small, capable with a viewfinder that wasn’t strictly an EVF and was a fixed or zoom lens around 35mm. I’m very habitual so I didn’t want to break my routine of looking through the viewfinder to make a photo. Shooting weddings is all DSLR and this camera will be with me during weddings for those “argh I’m not set up for this club-scene style snap right now” moments. This means having the great viewfinder on the X100 is important for me. Beyond that my requirements were far less strict and the market was open. After comparing all of the available cameras and soon-to-be’s I settled on the X100.
The x100 hung between the Olympus Trip 35 and the Canon AF35m
Shooting
Of course, like any camera it’s not without it’s problems if you look hard enough, yet on the x100 you do not need to look very hard:
The buttons on the back are annoying as hell and practically unusable with gloves on. The dial + menu/ok button is the most sensitive thing since that kid you knew in elementary school who would cry every time the lights went off for movie time. This is not exclusive to the x100, there’s not one compact system camera like the x100 or nex-7 which doesn’t have people moaning about the button config. The coming Fujifilm X-Pro 1 improves on this though and has fewer buttons and do-dad-dials then most. Saying that, I found I quickly adjusted to the X100′s buttons and before I knew it, it wasn’t an issue. Furthermore, the more you use the camera and learn it’s ways, the less you use the buttons. You simply do not need to mess with anything to make great photos. It’s not a DSLR I needn’t remind you.
The AF could be faster of course, but so could the AF on my D3. In a perfect world, everything would be in focus all of the time but that’s not the way it is. Two parts zone focusing and a little bit of skill soon had the focus accurate and simple. And by accurate I mean, holy cow accurate. When that square lights up green you better believe it’s damn well in focus. It still has better autofocus then an M9 or similar rangefinder which, in case you live in a cave, have zero autofocus.
The battery life albeit okay, should be better given the functions the camera served for me. Instinctively I treated the camera like the film bodies it’s modeled so closely after. I chimped for just three to four percent of the total photos I shot and I used the electronic function of the splendidly designed Hybrid-EVF only five or six times in total. In the viewfinder it will pop up the photo you just shot for 1.5 seconds after you take it, quite handy at staying stealth on the digital functions of your film like body and doesn’t use as much battery as standard chimping. Still, I was wishing I’d picked up an additional battery as midway through day 2 with no charge for the previous 30~ hours with very light shooting it was kaput. Batteries are cheap though and they’re small enough to put in a pocket of every jacket you own and just forget about till you need it.
The speedy f/2.0 fixed 23mm (or 35mm in full frame terms) is spot on for my needs as a walkaround camera. Anything wider is a touch too wide and anything tighter is a touch too close. Though the x100′s lens is not interchangeable, there are other similar camera’s (nex-7, x-pro 1, ep-1) that are. For what these cameras are meant to be, I’m fine with the 35mm non-interchangable lens on the x100. In fact I’m thrilled because there are benefits to having an attached lens.
Despite some of the negatives of this camera, like the need to put gaffer tape over the back buttons to prevent accidental button mashing, the benefits of the x100 outweigh the problems overall. After I adjusted to the foreign menu UI and the sensitivity of the buttons it became quite simple to manage and really became second nature and quick to use. It’s not for everyone but there’s certainly a reason why Zach Arias loves this camera, and I do too.
X100 in pants pocket
Not A Review
This isn’t a review however so the full breakdown of this cameras pros-cons can be found elsewhere. What this is is a statement for all those people who are not professional photographers but feel the need to rush out and drop $2000 on a DSLR, lenses, tripods, bags and filters. Listen up: You don’t need it. Without a DSLR, without a big camera bag, without multiple lenses, without sweaty strap-neck or the need to be weary of someone running off with it the second I put the camera down I was able to enjoy my vacation for what it was without the sacrifice of making nice photos when I wanted. These new compact systems cameras (CSC’s) are so light and tiny, it’s trivial to throw them in your jacket pocket and be done with it. Eventually, I discovered that the x100 could actually fit inside my pants’ pocket. Mind you, it looked as though I had a minor addiction to chewing tobacco but the point stands: it was in my pants pocket without any concerns to my personal comfort level. Try that with even the smallest DSLR.
CSC’s like the Nex-7 for instance, are nice if it’s you’re only camera system or you’re already a Sony shooter. You have the full lineup of Sony lenses to pick from and assuming you’re not sucked into taking ten of those heavy lenses with you on your trip to Jamaica, you’ll maintain the status of traveling light. Conceivably, you could travel quite well with the Nex-7 in your pocket with two lenses in your jacket pockets, wide + tight, and be done with it. For a walkabout camera though, that’s not light enough and it doesn’t tick several of the other boxes, such as an optical viewfinder with the ability to kick into the digital age at the pull of a switch. Plus, unlike the Fujifilm X series, the Sony Nex or Olympus do not have the old timer rangefinder feel that will keep thieving eyes from even bothering.
At one point during this trip I was asked by security to delete my photos. She came over and demanded “you need to delete those” and I said “it’s film” and showed her the front of the camera. Smiling she said “oh, don’t worry about it” and walked away.
The point here is that I was able to spend an entire weekend in Ottawa without a DSLR and I didn’t miss it once. Honestly, when it was 24 degrees outside I didn’t turn to a friend and say “Boy, I sure do miss having 7lbs of camera equipment around my neck right now“. And I didn’t say to airport security as I carried on everything I had for fear of the guys destroying it in baggage or leaving it on the runway “hey, shame I don’t have thirty pounds of camera bag to open up and have you put your grubby hands all over“. Nope, I didn’t say any of that.
What I did say was “Is my camera in my jacket pocket? Yes it is, it’s so light I’ve forgotten it’s even there” and “hey security, there’s a camera in my jacket pocket which makes pictures as good as my D3 yet it’s one fifth the size“. No longer weighed down with the burdens of a DSLR, the ability to still make fantastic photos and to still enjoy the process, enjoy my holiday even, is what’s liberating about the X100 and other compact system camera like the Sony Nex series.
Check out more pics from the x100 here
Cat’s outta the bag – what’s in yours?
I’ve decided that I want to start taking photos of my camera bags as the lineup changes. This lineup in particular is my daily setup of the moment. I pretty much lug this one around with me everywhere. I am constantly working on my photo projects and this is the setup that works for me to accomplish that.
I have umpteen different film cameras that I really enjoy using, but lately my daily shooter has been the Bessa R2. I’ve fallen head over heels with it. I usually shoot with the voightlander 35mm ƒ/1.4 mounted to the front of it. For the most part its not technically “in the bag” because its small enough that i can have it slung around my shoulder, but it will fit in the bag if need be. This is the camera that I am using most for my “A City Like Ours” project. At the moment I have the crumplier strap attached, but I’m on the look out for a classic smallish leather strap for it. There’s not much weight in the bessa so it doesn’t warrant the thick padding that the crumplier offers.
The gripped 5d1 is my workhorse – though day to day it usually stays in the bag unless I happen upon a wonderfully dressed individual to participate in my Stitchup project. It’s got my 85 ƒ/1.8 fixed. I’ve stuck the black rapid strap on there for when I do sling it over the shoulder.
My wallet – contains no money, but does have my impossible project pioneer card… And my Id’s and stuff.
My film, mostly I use ilford XP2 400iso, but in my point and shoot Olympus XA2 (not pictured because technically its always in my right jacket pocket) usually anything will do in that. So there’s som Kodak PortraNC, and the last of my big lot of Fuji superia.
There’s the iPad. My water bottle, my broken shoe mount flash that I use handheld… On the side of it is a bongo tied Jainisi wireless trigger and the commander is just below it.
The bag itself is the Ari Marcopoulis sling from Incase. Who for a company that until recently had not done much in the way of camera bags did a smashing job on this one. the quality of the materials used is just phenominal. It has it’s shortfalls, but all in all it’s a my favorite bag for this type of setup.
Do you have a daily shooter setup? Toss a camera in your daily messenger bag or purse? Share it in the forums!
Fancey Moments
Mark Fancey halloween weekend 2009 - Water Street
Street photography can mean capturing fleeting moments in peoples lives. Sometimes you snap the shot and walk on by, sometimes you engage your subject, other times, they engage you.
Two years ago I was out on a the night before halloween I was shooting the costumed, bar hopping masses that populate george street and surrounding area on such an occasion. I hung out in areas where I could use shop window light as a source and so I could properly make out who I was about to shoot before it happened. Late in the evening, a cyclist who didn’t look like a cyclist, and and didn’t look like he was wearing a costume came towards me. I fired a frame of him biking by, and he slowed his pace and turned around and Asked me what I was doing. I told him the usual: “I’m taking photos of interesting people, its good night for it.” and so on. Normally that disarms people, they accept that I found them interesting enough to snap a shot of and they walk away. Not this time.
Continue Reading This Post?
Camera Crank: Megapixels and EVF Clutter
Sadly I fear that all cameras as we now know them may become classics because they may cease to exist as stand alone devices.”
At the ripe old age of 31 I am beginning to feel like a dinosaur. Still Shooting my film, with my collection of vintage cameras. Or buying last years model of full frame digital body because its tested and true. There’s no denying that there are exciting things happening in technology, and they’re great useful things, the future is now blah, blah, blah…
Is it though?
In a forum discussion about what today’s “future classics” might be, fourmer Terrance Hounsel pointed to recent news of the Nokia 41mp camera phone and claimed “Sadly I fear that all cameras as we all now know them may become classics because they may cease to exist as stand alone devices.” I can’t bring myself to want to even acknowledge this phone… this camera… this thing’s existence. Don’t get me wrong, I love having a phone with a camera. It allows me to take notes, snaps of things, but its just that, a snapshot camera for grabbing fleeting moments. I love that my phone can do 41 million things, it makes my life easier in so many ways but 41 Megapixels in a phone is completely farcical. This is not growth of technology, it’s an abomination. I thought we’d grown beyond the whole megapixel war thing — the exit strategy had already begun hadn’t it?
Sony Alpha 65 EVF
Another photo/tech trend that I am too cantankerous to enjoy are Electronic View Finders (EVFs) popping up everywhere. Some people are in love with them, and yes they do allow for having a viewfinder in the smaller camera bodies, that’s great – I will never have one, they get in the way. I want to see what I’m shooting for what it is, not be bombarded with information while straining my eyes on more screen time. I’ve heard the argument “but they gain up so you can see better in the dark”. Speaking as someone who’s low light vision is horrible, you might think that it’d be a major selling feature. It’s not. Not for me. As my eyes do slowly adjust to lower light I become aware of my whole environment. If I’m looking into what amounts to a teensy ultra bright screen, I’m disconnected from everything except whats framed and ruining what little low light vision I do have because my eyes have adjusted to the insane bright screen.
For my own sanity and the sake of photography as a whole I really hope Terrance’s fears do not come to fruition. Although there are devices that are made more convenient by adding multiple tasks and features, there’s beauty in a tool that is made for one purpose. I like the purity of looking through an optical view finder, framing a shot of something I am making a physical connection with. Then hitting the trigger at the right time with no delay.
My hope is that these things are seen for what they are. Consumer fads and trinkets. What are the chances. Perhaps I’m just that crotchety old man, afraid of the future.