'Functor' web sites
Conal elliott
conal.net 2012-04-20 ⚑tech ⚑blog
functor . Comment Parallel tree scanning by composition 24th May 2011, 12 31 pm My last few blog posts have been on the theme of scans, and particularly on parallel scans. In Composable parallel scanning, I tackled parallel scanning in a very general setting. There are five simple building blocks out of which a vast assortment of data structures can be built, namely constant no value , identity one value , sum, product, and
conal.net 2012-04-20 ⚑tech ⚑blog
functor . Comment Parallel tree scanning by composition 24th May 2011, 12 31 pm My last few blog posts have been on the theme of scans, and particularly on parallel scans. In Composable parallel scanning, I tackled parallel scanning in a very general setting. There are five simple building blocks out of which a vast assortment of data structures can be built, namely constant no value , identity one value , sum, product, and
MORE
ⓘ
Conal elliott blog archive functional concurrency with unambiguous choice [..]
functor . Testing Data.Lub 0 Exception Prelude.undefined Data.Lub 0 Exception Prelude.undefined Data.Lub ptimes 0 0 Data.Lub 0 ptimes 0 Implementation Let 8217;s assume we had ambiguous choice amb a. a. IO a which applies to any two values of the same type, including fully defined, unequal values. Ambiguous choice nondeterministically chooses one or the other of the values, at its own whim, and may yield different results for the
Warning
You must be 18 to use this uncensored search engine. No cookie used by this web site.
Asymmetries in prosodic domain formation. lingbuzz 000429
ling.auf.net 2015-05-10 ⚑tech
functor precedes its complement, it is phrased separately; if it follows its complement or part of it, the two are phrased together and the functor is prosodically subordinated and affixed to the preceding prosodic constituent. The prosodic asymmetry is first shown for the relation between predicates and their complements, and is then generalized to modification. A recursive algorithm is presented that derives the correct prosodic
ling.auf.net 2015-05-10 ⚑tech
functor precedes its complement, it is phrased separately; if it follows its complement or part of it, the two are phrased together and the functor is prosodically subordinated and affixed to the preceding prosodic constituent. The prosodic asymmetry is first shown for the relation between predicates and their complements, and is then generalized to modification. A recursive algorithm is presented that derives the correct prosodic
Terml embedding examples
erights.org 2006-11-19 ⚑shop
functor cannot correspond to any XML.QName, an XML.oriented interpreter of this term.tree knows that this first argument is to be interpreted as holding attributes. If an Element has no attributes, this optional first argument may be omitted. If an Element has no children, such as the following XHTML, img alt ELM architecture src eLanguageMachine.gif then the parentheses which would enclose only the attributes can be left out img
erights.org 2006-11-19 ⚑shop
functor cannot correspond to any XML.QName, an XML.oriented interpreter of this term.tree knows that this first argument is to be interpreted as holding attributes. If an Element has no attributes, this optional first argument may be omitted. If an Element has no children, such as the following XHTML, img alt ELM architecture src eLanguageMachine.gif then the parentheses which would enclose only the attributes can be left out img
Http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/lawvere+theory
ncatlab.org 2012-03-27 ⚑shop
functor out of that category. This type of category is what is nowadays called a Lawvere algebraic theory, or just Lawvere theory. Definition Definition A Lawvere theory or finite.product theory is equivalently encoded by its syntactic category which is a category T with finite products in which every object is isomorphic to a finite cartesian power x n x x x of a distinguished object x called the generic object for the theory T.
ncatlab.org 2012-03-27 ⚑shop
functor out of that category. This type of category is what is nowadays called a Lawvere algebraic theory, or just Lawvere theory. Definition Definition A Lawvere theory or finite.product theory is equivalently encoded by its syntactic category which is a category T with finite products in which every object is isomorphic to a finite cartesian power x n x x x of a distinguished object x called the generic object for the theory T.
MORE
ⓘ
Http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/geometric+theory
functor Toposes 0,1.topos, Heyting algebra, locale pretopos topos Grothendieck topos category of presheaves presheaf representable presheaf category of sheaves site sieve coverage, pretopology, topology sheaf sheafification quasitopos base topos, indexed topos Internal Logic categorical semantics internal logic subobject classifier natural numbers object Topos morphisms logical morphism geometric morphism direct image inverse
MORE
ⓘ
Http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/smooth%20algebra
functor C X, CartSp Set.C infty X,. CartSp to Set ,. Since the hom. functor sends limits to limits in its second argument this is clearly product preserving. C X, n m C X, n C X, m C infty X, mathbb R n times mathbb R m simeq C infty X, mathbb R n times C infty X, mathbb R m If as usual we write C X C X, for the set of just.valued smooth functions, then the usual pointwise product of functions C X C X C X cdot C infty X times C
Apache commons x2013; apache commons
commons.apache.org 2016-02-19
functor A functor is a function that can be manipulated as an object, or an object representing a single, generic function. 1.0 2011... Imaging previously called Sanselan A pure.Java image library. 0.97.incubator 2009.02.20 IO Collection of I O utilities. 2.4 2012.07.06 JCI Java Compiler Interface 1.1 2013.10.14 JCS Java Caching System 1.3 2007.06.11 Jelly XML based scripting and processing engine. 1.0 2005.06.16 Jexl Expression
commons.apache.org 2016-02-19
functor A functor is a function that can be manipulated as an object, or an object representing a single, generic function. 1.0 2011... Imaging previously called Sanselan A pure.Java image library. 0.97.incubator 2009.02.20 IO Collection of I O utilities. 2.4 2012.07.06 JCI Java Compiler Interface 1.1 2013.10.14 JCS Java Caching System 1.3 2007.06.11 Jelly XML based scripting and processing engine. 1.0 2005.06.16 Jexl Expression
Why lawvere theories have finite products. and more. mathoverflow
mathoverflow.net 2012-03-23 ⚑shop ⚑xxx
functor I aleph 0 text op rightarrow L preserving finite products. Why a Lawvere theory have n.products for any n finite. For example, why isn t a Lawvere theory for monoids a category T with four elements 1 , T , T 2 and T 3 , and morphisms e 1 to T and T 2 to T making the appropiate diagrams commute and such that they are products of each other as expected. T 3 is needed in order to state these diagrams Also, why do they usually
mathoverflow.net 2012-03-23 ⚑shop ⚑xxx
functor I aleph 0 text op rightarrow L preserving finite products. Why a Lawvere theory have n.products for any n finite. For example, why isn t a Lawvere theory for monoids a category T with four elements 1 , T , T 2 and T 3 , and morphisms e 1 to T and T 2 to T making the appropiate diagrams commute and such that they are products of each other as expected. T 3 is needed in order to state these diagrams Also, why do they usually
Communicating haskell processes
www.cs.kent.ac.uk 2013-02-14 ⚑books
functor for CHP were also added. 10th September 2009 Uploaded a new version of the tutorial, correcting several errors thanks to Doug Burke for pointing them out. 15th September 2009 CHP v1.3.1 released. This version fixes some build dependency problems with version 1.3.0. 23rd September 2009 CHP v1.3.2 released. This version adds two useful functions furtherEnroll and arrStrict, and contains some optimisations. 1st October 2009
www.cs.kent.ac.uk 2013-02-14 ⚑books
functor for CHP were also added. 10th September 2009 Uploaded a new version of the tutorial, correcting several errors thanks to Doug Burke for pointing them out. 15th September 2009 CHP v1.3.1 released. This version fixes some build dependency problems with version 1.3.0. 23rd September 2009 CHP v1.3.2 released. This version adds two useful functions furtherEnroll and arrStrict, and contains some optimisations. 1st October 2009
Johnbender.us
nickelcode.com 2012-04-14 ⚑news ⚑blog
functor s from the same source to the same target categories alter morphisms of the source category2. Unfortunately the written descriptions seems to fall short in aiding comprehension, but as promised there are pretty pictures This equation is simple and captures the expected behavior of the natural transformation N used in place of hereafter. Namely, it must 8220;prepare 8221; input objects for a morphism transformed with G, ie G
nickelcode.com 2012-04-14 ⚑news ⚑blog
functor s from the same source to the same target categories alter morphisms of the source category2. Unfortunately the written descriptions seems to fall short in aiding comprehension, but as promised there are pretty pictures This equation is simple and captures the expected behavior of the natural transformation N used in place of hereafter. Namely, it must 8220;prepare 8221; input objects for a morphism transformed with G, ie G
Learning javascript with object graphs. how to node. nodejs
howtonode.org 2013-02-16
functor ; Call the function from four different scopesconsole.log Lane.description ;console.log Fred.description ;console.log description ;console.log description.call name Zed the Zetabyte ;OutputLane the Lambda Fred the functor undefined Zed the Zetabyte In the diagram, we see that even though Fred.description was set to Lane.description, it really only referencing the function. Thus all three references have equal ownership of
howtonode.org 2013-02-16
functor ; Call the function from four different scopesconsole.log Lane.description ;console.log Fred.description ;console.log description ;console.log description.call name Zed the Zetabyte ;OutputLane the Lambda Fred the functor undefined Zed the Zetabyte In the diagram, we see that even though Fred.description was set to Lane.description, it really only referencing the function. Thus all three references have equal ownership of
Recent pastes. hpaste
hpaste.org 2009-11-02
functor .7 hourshaskelldcouttscabal.install bottom.up pruning8 hourstext.9 hourshaskell.9 hourshaskell.9 hourshaskell.10 hourshaskell.10 hourshaskellchrisdonezen coding like thing13 hourshaskelltwbsimple runghc knock.off for ARM15 hourshaskell.17 hourshaskellmagtheQ on patter matching17 hourshaskell.19 hourshaskellrkqrqiabtwFaaPVJSERDrNkEe21 hourshaskelllater earlierhpaste 2008. git clone http code.haskell.org
hpaste.org 2009-11-02
functor .7 hourshaskelldcouttscabal.install bottom.up pruning8 hourstext.9 hourshaskell.9 hourshaskell.9 hourshaskell.10 hourshaskell.10 hourshaskellchrisdonezen coding like thing13 hourshaskelltwbsimple runghc knock.off for ARM15 hourshaskell.17 hourshaskellmagtheQ on patter matching17 hourshaskell.19 hourshaskellrkqrqiabtwFaaPVJSERDrNkEe21 hourshaskelllater earlierhpaste 2008. git clone http code.haskell.org
Conal elliott
conal.net 2012-04-20 ⚑tech ⚑blog
functor . Comment Parallel tree scanning by composition 24th May 2011, 12 31 pm My last few blog posts have been on the theme of scans, and particularly on parallel scans. In Composable parallel scanning, I tackled parallel scanning in a very general setting. There are five simple building blocks out of which a vast assortment of data structures can be built, namely constant no value , identity one value , sum, product, and
conal.net 2012-04-20 ⚑tech ⚑blog
functor . Comment Parallel tree scanning by composition 24th May 2011, 12 31 pm My last few blog posts have been on the theme of scans, and particularly on parallel scans. In Composable parallel scanning, I tackled parallel scanning in a very general setting. There are five simple building blocks out of which a vast assortment of data structures can be built, namely constant no value , identity one value , sum, product, and
MORE
ⓘ
Conal elliott blog archive functional concurrency with unambiguous choice [..]
functor . Testing Data.Lub 0 Exception Prelude.undefined Data.Lub 0 Exception Prelude.undefined Data.Lub ptimes 0 0 Data.Lub 0 ptimes 0 Implementation Let 8217;s assume we had ambiguous choice amb a. a. IO a which applies to any two values of the same type, including fully defined, unequal values. Ambiguous choice nondeterministically chooses one or the other of the values, at its own whim, and may yield different results for the
Johnbender.us
nickelcode.com 2012-04-14 ⚑news ⚑blog
functor s from the same source to the same target categories alter morphisms of the source category2. Unfortunately the written descriptions seems to fall short in aiding comprehension, but as promised there are pretty pictures This equation is simple and captures the expected behavior of the natural transformation N used in place of hereafter. Namely, it must 8220;prepare 8221; input objects for a morphism transformed with G, ie G
nickelcode.com 2012-04-14 ⚑news ⚑blog
functor s from the same source to the same target categories alter morphisms of the source category2. Unfortunately the written descriptions seems to fall short in aiding comprehension, but as promised there are pretty pictures This equation is simple and captures the expected behavior of the natural transformation N used in place of hereafter. Namely, it must 8220;prepare 8221; input objects for a morphism transformed with G, ie G
Terml embedding examples
erights.org 2006-11-19 ⚑shop
functor cannot correspond to any XML.QName, an XML.oriented interpreter of this term.tree knows that this first argument is to be interpreted as holding attributes. If an Element has no attributes, this optional first argument may be omitted. If an Element has no children, such as the following XHTML, img alt ELM architecture src eLanguageMachine.gif then the parentheses which would enclose only the attributes can be left out img
erights.org 2006-11-19 ⚑shop
functor cannot correspond to any XML.QName, an XML.oriented interpreter of this term.tree knows that this first argument is to be interpreted as holding attributes. If an Element has no attributes, this optional first argument may be omitted. If an Element has no children, such as the following XHTML, img alt ELM architecture src eLanguageMachine.gif then the parentheses which would enclose only the attributes can be left out img
Http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/lawvere+theory
ncatlab.org 2012-03-27 ⚑shop
functor out of that category. This type of category is what is nowadays called a Lawvere algebraic theory, or just Lawvere theory. Definition Definition A Lawvere theory or finite.product theory is equivalently encoded by its syntactic category which is a category T with finite products in which every object is isomorphic to a finite cartesian power x n x x x of a distinguished object x called the generic object for the theory T.
ncatlab.org 2012-03-27 ⚑shop
functor out of that category. This type of category is what is nowadays called a Lawvere algebraic theory, or just Lawvere theory. Definition Definition A Lawvere theory or finite.product theory is equivalently encoded by its syntactic category which is a category T with finite products in which every object is isomorphic to a finite cartesian power x n x x x of a distinguished object x called the generic object for the theory T.
Why lawvere theories have finite products. and more. mathoverflow
mathoverflow.net 2012-03-23 ⚑shop ⚑xxx
functor I aleph 0 text op rightarrow L preserving finite products. Why a Lawvere theory have n.products for any n finite. For example, why isn t a Lawvere theory for monoids a category T with four elements 1 , T , T 2 and T 3 , and morphisms e 1 to T and T 2 to T making the appropiate diagrams commute and such that they are products of each other as expected. T 3 is needed in order to state these diagrams Also, why do they usually
mathoverflow.net 2012-03-23 ⚑shop ⚑xxx
functor I aleph 0 text op rightarrow L preserving finite products. Why a Lawvere theory have n.products for any n finite. For example, why isn t a Lawvere theory for monoids a category T with four elements 1 , T , T 2 and T 3 , and morphisms e 1 to T and T 2 to T making the appropiate diagrams commute and such that they are products of each other as expected. T 3 is needed in order to state these diagrams Also, why do they usually
MORE
ⓘ
Http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/smooth%20algebra
functor C X, CartSp Set.C infty X,. CartSp to Set ,. Since the hom. functor sends limits to limits in its second argument this is clearly product preserving. C X, n m C X, n C X, m C infty X, mathbb R n times mathbb R m simeq C infty X, mathbb R n times C infty X, mathbb R m If as usual we write C X C X, for the set of just.valued smooth functions, then the usual pointwise product of functions C X C X C X cdot C infty X times C
Why lawvere theories have finite products. and more. mathoverflow
mathoverflow.net 2012-03-23 ⚑shop ⚑xxx
functor I aleph 0 text op rightarrow L preserving finite products. Why a Lawvere theory have n.products for any n finite. For example, why isn t a Lawvere theory for monoids a category T with four elements 1 , T , T 2 and T 3 , and morphisms e 1 to T and T 2 to T making the appropiate diagrams commute and such that they are products of each other as expected. T 3 is needed in order to state these diagrams Also, why do they usually
mathoverflow.net 2012-03-23 ⚑shop ⚑xxx
functor I aleph 0 text op rightarrow L preserving finite products. Why a Lawvere theory have n.products for any n finite. For example, why isn t a Lawvere theory for monoids a category T with four elements 1 , T , T 2 and T 3 , and morphisms e 1 to T and T 2 to T making the appropiate diagrams commute and such that they are products of each other as expected. T 3 is needed in order to state these diagrams Also, why do they usually
Communicating haskell processes
www.cs.kent.ac.uk 2013-02-14 ⚑books
functor for CHP were also added. 10th September 2009 Uploaded a new version of the tutorial, correcting several errors thanks to Doug Burke for pointing them out. 15th September 2009 CHP v1.3.1 released. This version fixes some build dependency problems with version 1.3.0. 23rd September 2009 CHP v1.3.2 released. This version adds two useful functions furtherEnroll and arrStrict, and contains some optimisations. 1st October 2009
www.cs.kent.ac.uk 2013-02-14 ⚑books
functor for CHP were also added. 10th September 2009 Uploaded a new version of the tutorial, correcting several errors thanks to Doug Burke for pointing them out. 15th September 2009 CHP v1.3.1 released. This version fixes some build dependency problems with version 1.3.0. 23rd September 2009 CHP v1.3.2 released. This version adds two useful functions furtherEnroll and arrStrict, and contains some optimisations. 1st October 2009
No cookies are saved on your client
We are completely no-profit and volunteers
Use robots.txt to block indexing
Contact us via email for other removals
Read DMCA Policy
CopyLeft by GiPOCO 2006-2023
Contact us to contribute
info (at) gipoco.com
All trade marks, contents, etc
belong to their respective owners